Goldilocks zone for oil prices is gone for good | Alternative Energy | Forums

A A A
Avatar
Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Lost password?
sp_Feed F-Alternative-Energy
Goldilocks zone for oil prices is gone for good
Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
25 Mar ’15 - 8:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

An interesting article on the future volatility of oil

Five years ago, I wrote an article for Reuters titled “Goldilocks and the Three Fuels.” In it, I discussed what I call the Goldilocks price zone for oil, natural gas  and coal, a zone in which prices are “just right” — high enough to reward producers but low enough to entice consumers. Ever since the start of the fossil- fuel era, such a zone has existed. Sometimes price boundaries were transgressed on the upside, sometimes on the downside, but it was always possible to revert to the zone.

But now, the Goldilocks zone for oil has ceased to exist. This will have staggering consequences throughout the economy for the foreseeable future.

During the past decade, the Goldilocks zone for oil steadily migrated higher. As conventional crude reservoirs depleted and production rates leveled off, drillers had to spend proportionally more to develop the capacity to pump the next marginal barrel. Oil prices soared from $30 a barrel in 2005 to nearly $150 a barrel in 2008, collapsed during the economic crisis, then clawed their way back to roughly $100 a barrel, a price that was maintained through mid-2014. But the economy did not do well during this period. Despite massive bailouts, stimulus spending and low interest rates, the recovery following the 2008 crash was anemic.

However, at $100 a barrel, the oil price was high enough to incentivize fracking. Small, risk-friendly companies leased land and used expensive drilling techniques to free oil from rocks that geologists had previously described as too impermeable to bother with. This entailed a tenuous business model that required not only high oil prices but easy money as well, as low interest rates enabled producers to pile on enormous amounts of debt.

Oil production in the United States rose sharply as a result, and this eventually had an impact on prices. Since mid-2014, the oil price has declined by half, settling around the historic, inflation-adjusted mean price of $50 a barrel. Consumers are much happier than they were with oil at $100 a barrel, but producers are wilting. The American petroleum industry has seen more than 75,000 layoffs, the balance sheets of fracking companies are bleeding and drilling rigs are being idled by the score.

For consumers, experience suggests the acceptable oil-price zone is $40 to $60 a barrel in today’s dollars; higher than that, goods and services, particularly transportation, become more expensive than current spending patterns can handle. For producers, the acceptable zone is more like $80 to $120 a barrel; lower than that, upstream investments make little sense, so production will inevitably stall and decline — eventually making consumers even less happy.

http://blogs.reuters.....-for-good/

Avatar
DangerDuke
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 2030
Member Since:
21 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
25 Mar ’15 - 11:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I hope this just promotes a big push towards renewables. I want a car that runs on seawater or sunlight!

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
26 Mar ’15 - 7:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

could you imagine that, fill a car with water, it breaks down to Hydrogen and oxygen which fuels the combustion forming water again

Avatar
DangerDuke
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 2030
Member Since:
21 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
26 Mar ’15 - 12:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

KVR said
could you imagine that, fill a car with water, it breaks down to Hydrogen and oxygen which fuels the combustion forming water again

didn't you post about china having a train that does this?

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
26 Mar ’15 - 7:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

kind of, but it uses straight hydrogen for the fuel source

Avatar
DangerDuke
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 2030
Member Since:
21 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
27 Mar ’15 - 5:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I know the Navy is working on it

http://rt.com/usa/na.....-ship-197/

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
27 Mar ’15 - 8:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

forgot all about that, wonder if the tech will filter to the civilian market eventually

Avatar
DangerDuke
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 2030
Member Since:
21 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
28 Mar ’15 - 7:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

KVR said
forgot all about that, wonder if the tech will filter to the civilian market eventually

yeah, twenty years later lol

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 698

Currently Online:
127 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

easytapper: 2149

DangerDuke: 2030

groinkick: 1667

PorkChopsMmm: 1515

Gravel Road: 1455

Newest Members:

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 12

Topics: 11482

Posts: 58640

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 19842

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: K