Log In
Home
15 Feb ’12
Offline
Will be interesting to see how this turns out
A US federal magistrate has ordered Apple to help the Federal Bureau of Investigation unlock the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino shooters.
The order is the most high-profile case yet of the federal government trying to figure out how to use existing law to get around stronger encryption being used in consumers’ phones. It is likely to add more fire to an already heated debate between Silicon Valley and Washington DC about the balance between national security and electronic privacy.
In this case, the FBI director, James Comey, has said his agents have been locked out of one of the shooter’s phones as they search for evidence about the mass shootings in December 2015.
Investigators are still trying to determine to what extent the shooters were influenced by radical Islamic terrorist groups and who they had been in touch with before the rampage.
more http://www.theguardi.....er-for-fbi
Apple responds
6 Oct ’15
Offline
I am happy is 'defending' their position... I would not have expected them to fight this.
15 Feb ’12
Offline
Neither did I, surprised to be honest
19 Feb ’12
Offline
Not sure how I feel about this. Obviously, I applaud apple for fighting, and not rolling over and setting the precedent. But at the same time, it's the employer's phone, and they've authorized it. In addition, there is a search warrant. Not sure why Apple is fighting this.
6 Oct ’15
Offline
On the news today, Apple said they would need to develop software/or a way to do this...and once the technology is out they would lose control of how it's used. Good points on both sides. I think if the gov't. got ahold of such technology that they would abuse it...then again, this is a terrorist related issue....which way truly serves the greater good? Not sure.
15 Feb ’12
Offline
looks like apple has some explaining to do
http://www.thedailyb.....efore.html
google is onboard though
21 Feb ’12
Offline
I think the issue is that they aren't just calling for apple to unlock one phone, they want a backdoor specifically built for government. The argument is that with a back door in place, someone will figure out how to exploit it.
As for it being a terrorist related issue, that shouldn't even play into it. They used the same logic after 911 to pass the patriot act. Are attacks like this tragic, yes to be sure. That's not a good reson to go down the slippery slope of handing over liberty however. Once you give it up it's damn hard to get it back.
The following users say thank you to DangerDuke for this useful post:
Gravel Road
6 Feb ’14
Offline
DangerDuke said
I think the issue is that they aren't just calling for apple to unlock one phone, they want a backdoor specifically built for government. The argument is that with a back door in place, someone will figure out how to exploit it.
This is old hat (been there, done that, and we've seen the fall-out). Namely an exploit I've recently mentioned elsewhere here on the forum called FREAK.
The negatives FAR outweigh the positives... You know once upon a time we used this stuff called paper. When we were done, we could shred it, burn it, and bleach the dried ashes. Nothing left behind to be recovered by prying eyes. Strong encryption essentially provides the same privacy without necessarily destroying anything. Instead of violating personal freedoms by forcing new backdoor exploits, how about some actual investigative detective work. That's been around long before electronics were a glimmer in our eye and this is just pure invasive laziness.
Most Users Ever Online: 698
Currently Online:
91 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
easytapper: 2149
DangerDuke: 2030
groinkick: 1667
PorkChopsMmm: 1515
Gravel Road: 1455
Newest Members:
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 12
Topics: 11482
Posts: 58640
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 19842
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Administrators: K
