Apple ordered to decrypt iPhone of San Bernardino shooter for FBI | Emergency Preparedness | Forums

A A A
Avatar
Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Lost password?
sp_Feed F-Emergency-Preparedness
Apple ordered to decrypt iPhone of San Bernardino shooter for FBI
Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
17 Feb ’16 - 11:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Will be interesting to see how this turns out

A US federal magistrate has ordered Apple to help the Federal Bureau of Investigation unlock the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino shooters.

The order is the most high-profile case yet of the federal government trying to figure out how to use existing law to get around stronger encryption being used in consumers’ phones. It is likely to add more fire to an already heated debate between Silicon Valley and Washington DC about the balance between national security and electronic privacy.

In this case, the FBI director, James Comey, has said his agents have been locked out of one of the shooter’s phones as they search for evidence about the mass shootings in December 2015.

Investigators are still trying to determine to what extent the shooters were influenced by radical Islamic terrorist groups and who they had been in touch with before the rampage.

more http://www.theguardi.....er-for-fbi

Apple responds

http://www.apple.com.....er-letter/

Avatar
Gravel Road
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 1455
Member Since:
6 Oct ’15
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
17 Feb ’16 - 12:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I am happy is 'defending' their position... I would not have expected them to fight this.

"The universe is wider than our views of it." -HDT
Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
17 Feb ’16 - 5:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Neither did I, surprised to be honest

Avatar
easytapper
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 2149
Member Since:
19 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
17 Feb ’16 - 7:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Not sure how I feel about this.  Obviously, I applaud apple for fighting, and not rolling over and setting the precedent.   But at the same time, it's the employer's phone, and they've authorized it.  In addition, there is a search warrant.  Not sure why Apple is fighting this.

Avatar
Gravel Road
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 1455
Member Since:
6 Oct ’15
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
17 Feb ’16 - 8:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

On the news today, Apple said they would need to develop software/or a way to do this...and once the technology is out they would lose control of how it's used.  Good points on both sides.  I think if the gov't. got ahold of such technology that they would abuse it...then again, this is a terrorist related issue....which way truly serves the greater good?  Not sure.

"The universe is wider than our views of it." -HDT
Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
18 Feb ’16 - 9:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

looks like apple has some explaining to do

http://www.thedailyb.....efore.html

google is onboard though

http://www.theverge......encryption

Avatar
DangerDuke
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 2030
Member Since:
21 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
18 Feb ’16 - 5:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I think the issue is that they aren't just calling for apple to unlock one phone, they want a backdoor specifically built for government. The argument is that with a back door in place, someone will figure out how to exploit it. 

As for it being a terrorist related issue, that shouldn't even play into it. They used the same logic after 911 to pass the patriot act. Are attacks like this tragic, yes to be sure. That's not a good reson to go down the slippery slope of handing over liberty however. Once you give it up it's damn hard to get it back.

The following users say thank you to DangerDuke for this useful post:

Gravel Road
Avatar
earthenstead
Central Arkansas
Farm Hand
Members
Forum Posts: 853
Member Since:
6 Feb ’14
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
19 Feb ’16 - 3:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

DangerDuke said
I think the issue is that they aren't just calling for apple to unlock one phone, they want a backdoor specifically built for government. The argument is that with a back door in place, someone will figure out how to exploit it.

 

This is old hat (been there, done that, and we've seen the fall-out). Namely an exploit I've recently mentioned elsewhere here on the forum called FREAK.

The negatives FAR outweigh the positives... You know once upon a time we used this stuff called paper. When we were done, we could shred it, burn it, and bleach the dried ashes. Nothing left behind to be recovered by prying eyes. Strong encryption essentially provides the same privacy without necessarily destroying anything. Instead of violating personal freedoms by forcing new backdoor exploits, how about some actual investigative detective work. That's been around long before electronics were a glimmer in our eye and this is just pure invasive laziness.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 698

Currently Online:
30 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

easytapper: 2149

DangerDuke: 2030

groinkick: 1667

PorkChopsMmm: 1515

Gravel Road: 1455

Newest Members:

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 12

Topics: 11482

Posts: 58640

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 19842

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: K