my dad asked me today if I had heard they were taking money out of peoples bank accounts, I came across this news account
http://www.nytimes.c.....&_r=0
came across this quote in the article, wow
Today, Germany is engaging in Nazism again, not with the weapon of force, but with money, said a pensioner, Dimitris, 67, who would give only his first name.
is this the beginning of the end of the EU? I read the UK is flying in money as temporary loans for it's military personnel in preparation of the banks collapsing
21 Oct ’12
Germany says the will bail them out but only 90% Cyprus will be responsible for the other 10% so what do those idiots do they start taking it directly out of there citizens bank accounts which caused a run on the banks so they changed it to only people who have 20k in there banks will get 10% deducted. Go to bed with 20k and wake up with 18k... yea expect a jump in gold and silver.
Nothing to do with Germany from what I understand and also the German people don't want there tax money being used to bail out the EU... Irresponsible spending has led them to bankruptcy. After reading that link I agree with Germany even more. So basically from my understanding is if Cyprus can not come with the 10% Germany will not bail out the other 90%.
"The central bank governor, Panicos O. Demetriades, had said the revised plan would fall 300 million short of the 5.8 billion demanded by the international lenders. The gap would be considered a breach of the bailout agreement, he said, and perhaps might not be accepted by the bailout negotiators."
The people should be more upset at there government for putting them into this position then Germany.
21 Oct ’12
This was linked from DrudgeReport. http://www.guardian......avings-tax
I guess i'm not really sure whats going on because Russia is saying the will bail them out also in return for some gas rights. Banks are to open tomorrow I wonder if there will be a run on the banks when they reopen.
21 Oct ’12
Found this on Reddit.
Let those lazy Cypriots pay for spending money relentlessly/tax-evading/etc
The problem in Cyprus is not similar to other EU countries. Of course the country is responsible for it, but in a different way. Cypriot banks, had the vast majority of their money invested in Greek bonds, and this is where the mistake lies. In case you are wondering, this is probably a combination of incompetence, and historical/cultural connections between Cyprus and Greece. As soon as the EU took the decision to wipe the value of those bonds by 80% for saving Greece, banks in Cyprus took a huge hit and these are the effects now.
But Cyprus has way too many deposits that reach almost 700% of their GDP
This is an irrelevant fact, as Cyprus had a healthy economy, up until the EU bailing out Greece (read previous paragraph).
Money in Cyprus banks is owned by the Russian mafia and is the result of money laundering
There has never been any evidence whatsoever in Cyprus of money laundering, despite repeated checks by the EU. In fact, EU's own agencies rank Cyprus better than countries like Germany, when it comes to compliance to EU laws for money laundering. Money laundering is a crime, and if there was any proof about it, the money would had been confiscated long ago.
http://www.frank-cs......toryid=473
But it's the Cypriot government that decided on this tax; why aren't the people of the Cyprus upset at their government?
The president was blackmailed by the EU/IMF, with the original proposal being to tax 40% of all Russian (or foreign?) deposits on the island. Everybody knew well that this would had a disastrous effect on Cyprus as a banking investing center, since foreign capital would flee out of the country. In order to avoid the alternative of getting kicked out of the Eurozone, the 6.75%/10% proposal was brought on the table by the government as a way to mitigate the damage across the board (given that the alternative was to get kicked out of the Euro).
Those lazy Cypriots have been enjoying 4% interest rates in years; what's a 10% tax to them?
Cyprus deposit rates have been high indeed, but loan rates have been much higher than the Eurozone as well. Overall, they've maintained a very healthy spread between deposit and loan rates for years now, and that is definitely not a factor in today's problems.
http://blogs.wsj.com.....a-lot-too/
Regardless of all of this, people there don't want to pay 10% for saving their country?
It is not about the money, but it's the unfairness of it. Unfairness for many reasons, one of which being that the problem exists in the first place, because of a previous decision taken by the EU (read first paragraph). We are talking about proud people that went through an actual war 39 years ago (not that long ago), and had to start from zero back then. They are willing to do it again, if it means not selling their country to foreigners.
So, they expect Germans to pay for their mess?
Recent estimates say that Germany will save at least 15 billion Euros in the next decade, because of the Euro crisis today. Link provided below so I won't go into details. Also, any potential loan will be paid by the IMF, the ECB and the countries of the Eurozone; not simply Germany. Also in order to understand the sizes we are talking about here, the GDP of the EU is 13 trillion, and Cyprus needs 6 billion for saving their banks (that's what the whole discussion is about).
http://www.reuters.c.....H020130318
Why are so many countries interested in this issue?
The Cyprus situation extends well beyond the economical aspects of the problem. In particular, there have been large newly discovered natural gas reserves south of the island. The one who gets to bail out the country from this mess, gets to set their own terms, and if played right, gets to have control over these very valuable resources. This is Europe's one chance to become less reliant on Russia, for natural gas. For Russia, this extends beyond the natural gas, to a military advantage as well, as they are about to lose their only naval base in the Mediterranean, which now exists in Syria.
29 Jan ’13
Found this this morning:
http://www.foxnews.c.....-rejected/
I think it was Margaret Thatcher that said: "The trouble with Socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other peoples money".
Would this be considered taxation without representation?
http://www.foxnews.c.....ssistance/
I don't know, folks, the world's a mess, this country is a mess and I don't see any way of fixing it.
Most Users Ever Online: 698
Currently Online:
120 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
easytapper: 2149
DangerDuke: 2030
groinkick: 1667
PorkChopsMmm: 1515
Gravel Road: 1455
Newest Members:
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 12
Topics: 11482
Posts: 58640
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 19842
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Administrators: K