WWIII Looming? | Emergency Preparedness | Forums

This has been looming for 4 years, at least to this end.

Before that and after the cold war we devastated them financially and surrounded them and scooped up former USSR's into NATO.

3 1/2 years ago US was trying to "oust Assad" and bomb Syria, asked for allied support, England told us to f*** off. Putin sent an open letter to the NY times addressed to the American people, warhawks got pissed. So the CIA went into Ukraine and destabilized that and started a civil war, then Crimea was annexed.

Then back to Syria after the U.S. thought they exhausted the Russians through that conflict and sanctions.

Well, Putin is the richest leader in the world, and China's Yuan was recently accepted as reserve currency. This allows sanctions to mean less as others can now trade with it.

So, Russia is fine. The Paris attacks were retaliation, and at the time, there was a contract up in the air to Canada for NATO jets, and that was the perfect opportunity to fly Raphaels into Syria and "Bomb ISIS", and videos were up on Youtube within 18 hours promoting the Raphael over the Typhoon, Super Hornet, and bunk F-35. But these are the side deals.

You'll remember the "chemical attacks" by Assad against his own people. Well, turned out that was US backed rebels against Assad.

The US has been running an anti-Russia campaign steadily for 3 years since after Putin sent the open letter to the NY times, and was subsequently nominated for the Nobel peace prize, so the 1%'r geopolitical shift is all over the place.

Late last December I believe, Russia had enough bullshit, and sent a strong worded statement to Obama, essentially saying "say it to our face, no more back door deals after backstabbing us on camera".

Soon after sanctions tightened. We all knew this was a proxy war as Syria is a key ally of Russia with a key naval port. You'll remember Turkey shot down the SU-24 Fencer(total NATO provacation) then Russia sent in S-300 & 400's in. A couple weeks later, Turkey's airman center was "suicide bombed" with dozens of their pilots dead. Hmmm......

Remember Obama hilarious speech a year ago, "ya know, there are folks out there callin this a proxy war between Russia and the US like this is some kinda chess match. Well, that's simply not true, you clearly haven't been looking at the chessboard".....UM, WHAT DID HE JUST SAY?!!

Russia made clear long ago it would war to lose conventionally, and they won't. They have the advantage in every single spectrum of nuclear weapons and defense.

Whereas before I thought the proxy war would continue through a rogue nuke, I now believe Russia will certainly strike first, and a lot of the world will not mourn. They will align with China/Russia.

I could go on forever, but if it's not getting any coverage, get your potassium iodide and geiger counters while you still can, and relatively cheap. It's prep time for bug out kits imo.

Unless you have a pre-1975 vehicle and some knowledge, or a farraday cage wrapped around your vehicle, ya better have bikes n horses, or lots of guns and ammo and an ugly home...

jl said

what does that first sentence mean 

and as for the second sentence, what in the world does it mean to have an advantage in nuclear weapons when the US has submarines scattered all over the world 

and an advantage in defense ?  

all Russian oil pipelines would be destroyed, Moscow would be destroyed, all farmland useless

would the US be screwed ?
absolutely
the entire East coast would be ash

but when it comes to nuclear war it really makes no sense to say one side has an advantage in defense over the other 

this is old, but still 
http://futureoflife......s/#nukemap

http://nuclearsecrec.....kemap/  

That first sentence was meant to say, "Russia made it clear in a confrontation they would go nuclear"

What it means to have an advantage in the the nuclear realm, is that they began stealthing their nukes during Putin's first term.

The hardest cross-section to detect is a stealth tube. While the U.S. was concentrating on conventional contracts, Russia was modernizing their nuke force, including subs. I believe no one "wins" in a nuclear war, per se. As Denzel Washington said in Crimson Tide, "The enemy is war itself". But if push came to shove, the U.S. has more to lose, is more transparent, smaller, with less.