21 Feb ’12
http://www.alternet......l-her-home
As reported by the Courier-Post on Sunday, the elderly Camden resident, accustomed to $50 or $60 quarterly water bills from United Water, received a bill for $2,167.02 earlier this year. She hadnt filled up an Olympic-sized swimming pool; according to her water bill, the water she used could have done so. No water leaks in her home were found, and her bill the next quarter was back to normal. United Water insisted that the insane charge was accurate, but couldnt explain why.
As a result of the unpaid water bill, a lien against Ms. Sochanskis home was sold in June. Ms. Sochanski was facing homelessness, and United Water wasnt talking.
Mistakes happen. But for United Water to continuously deny requests for comment or explanation from both the customer and the press, was unconscionable. Private companies dont have to tell the public anything about issues like this, as they are shockingly exempt from many public disclosure laws that local government utilities must abide by.
Even the city of Camden which itself recently settled a lawsuit with United Water over billing and performance issues, like the fact that the system was losing 45% of its water couldnt help Ms. Sochanski. For corporations like United Water, profit, not customer service, is the bottom line.
After an international outpouring of outrage and sympathy for Ms. Sochanski following the publishing of her story, an agreement was apparently made to resolve the lien on her home. But questions remain unanswered by United Water, and her now-increased $2,312 bill apparently still stands.
Most Users Ever Online: 698
Currently Online:
44 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
easytapper: 2149
DangerDuke: 2030
groinkick: 1667
PorkChopsMmm: 1515
Gravel Road: 1455
Newest Members:
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 12
Topics: 11482
Posts: 58640
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 19842
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Administrators: K