Andrew Huszar: Confessions of a Quantitative Easer | The Compost Bin | Forums

A A A
Avatar
Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Lost password?
sp_Feed F-Compost-Bin
Andrew Huszar: Confessions of a Quantitative Easer
Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
12 Nov ’13 - 5:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

how long before he has a brake failure?

Andrew Huszar, a former Federal Reserve employee who executed QE, has written a Wall Street Journal op-ed apologizing for the "unprecedented shopping spree."

Huszar worked at the Fed for seven years before leaving for Wall Street. The central bank recruited him back in 2009 to manage "what was at the heart of QE’s bond-buying spree–a wild attempt to buy $1.25 trillion in mortgage bonds in 12 months."

"I can only say: I'm sorry, America," Huszar writes. From the Journal:

It wasn't long before my old doubts resurfaced. Despite the Fed's rhetoric, my program wasn't helping to make credit any more accessible for the average American. The banks were only issuing fewer and fewer loans. More insidiously, whatever credit they were extending wasn't getting much cheaper. QE may have been driving down the wholesale cost for banks to make loans, but Wall Street was pocketing most of the extra cash.

From the trenches, several other Fed managers also began voicing the concern that QE wasn't working as planned. Our warnings fell on deaf ears. In the past, Fed leaders—even if they ultimately erred—would have worried obsessively about the costs versus the benefits of any major initiative. Now the only obsession seemed to be with the newest survey of financial-market expectations or the latest in-person feedback from Wall Street's leading bankers and hedge-fund managers. Sorry, U.S. taxpayer.

http://online.wsj.co.....0751473884

Avatar
Kamikaze-Emu
Farm Hand
Members
Forum Posts: 601
Member Since:
20 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
12 Nov ’13 - 7:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It is the banks not playing fair and passing it on that bothers me most. Just like what happened during the bailout, banks were given very favourable rates and then kept the status quo on loans to the people, pocketing the difference.

These incredible conditions are only in existence because the people are loaning their money to the banks, and in return the banks pocket the proceeds. A scam if ever I have seen one.

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
13 Nov ’13 - 9:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

yep, the whole thing was a sham

Avatar
groinkick
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 1667
Member Since:
3 Nov ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
13 Nov ’13 - 9:48 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Nothing to see here, move along people.

-US Corporatocrocy

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 698

Currently Online:
82 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

easytapper: 2149

DangerDuke: 2030

groinkick: 1667

PorkChopsMmm: 1515

Gravel Road: 1455

Newest Members:

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 12

Topics: 11482

Posts: 58640

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 19842

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: K