FBI to interview Hillary | The Compost Bin | Forums

A A A
Avatar
Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Lost password?
sp_Feed F-Compost-Bin
FBI to interview Hillary
Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
29 Mar ’16 - 10:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Is this going to be it?

Federal prosecutors investigating the possible mishandling of classified materials on Hillary Clinton’s private email server have begun the process of setting up formal interviews with some of her longtime and closest aides, according to two people familiar with the probe, an indication that the inquiry is moving into its final phases.

Those interviews and the final review of the case, however, could still take many weeks, all but guaranteeing that the investigation will continue to dog Clinton’s presidential campaign through most, if not all, of the remaining presidential primaries.

No dates have been set for questioning the advisors, but a federal prosecutor in recent weeks has called their lawyers to alert them that he would soon be doing so, the sources said. Prosecutors also are expected to seek an interview with Clinton herself, though the timing remains unclear.

more http://www.latimes.c.....story.html

they have 147 agents working on this

http://thehill.com/b.....mail-probe

Avatar
DangerDuke
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 2030
Member Since:
21 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
29 Mar ’16 - 5:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Nothing is going to come of it. The DOJ has already made it clear that even if the FBI insists on bringing charges, the DOJ has zero obligation to follow through on them.

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
30 Mar ’16 - 8:01 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I don't know, doesn't the DOJ have the authority to tell the FBI to back off?

Avatar
DangerDuke
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 2030
Member Since:
21 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
30 Mar ’16 - 10:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

They do, but it would look terrible if they just totally killed the veneer of the investigation. They are going to let the enforcement ranch do their due diligence, then simply say there's not enough to prosecute on. I'm almost sure of this. if it wasn't the case they would have already done it... unless they are holding off until she cinches the nomination.

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
31 Mar ’16 - 8:19 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

will be interesting, I would expect a backlash if it isn't pursued due to how much taxpayers money went into the investigation

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
1 Apr ’16 - 9:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

seems pretty accurate

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 698

Currently Online:
69 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

easytapper: 2149

DangerDuke: 2030

groinkick: 1667

PorkChopsMmm: 1515

Gravel Road: 1455

Newest Members:

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 12

Topics: 11482

Posts: 58640

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 19842

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: K