US House passes bill charging $5,000 to file complaint against drilling | The Compost Bin | Forums

A A A
Avatar
Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Lost password?
sp_Feed F-Compost-Bin
US House passes bill charging $5,000 to file complaint against drilling
Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
26 Nov ’13 - 2:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

big money runs this world

Key Elements of the bill include:

• A stipulation that if the Department of the Interior has not made a decision on an application within 60 days of receipt, the application will be considered approved.

• Requires the Secretary of the Interior to collect a $5,000 documentation fee to accompany each protest for a lease, right of way, or application for permit to drill.

• Requires a percentage of fees collected by the Bureau of Land Management to remain in the offices where they were collected to be used for “permit approval activities.”

• Requires a “Federal Permit Streamlining Project” in every Land Management office that permits energy projects on federal land.

• States that the Secretary shall not require a finding of extraordinary circumstances related to a categorical exclusion in administering the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPA 2005) with respect to review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).

(A "categorical exclusion" under NEPA is a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment and which have been found to have no such effect in procedures adopted by a federal agency in implementing environmental regulations and for which, therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.)

• Forces the Secretary of the Interior to offer at least 25% of the annual nominated acreage not previously made available for lease.

• Shields such acreage from protest and the test of extraordinary circumstances, but makes it eligible for certain categorical exclusions under EPA 2005 and NEPA.

• Limits the Secretary’s methods for denying permits

• Prohibits additional lease stipulations (except certain emergency stipulations) after the parcel is sold without consultation and agreement of the lessee.

http://www.digitaljo.....cle/362721

Avatar
farmboy2
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 1243
Member Since:
4 Mar ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
26 Nov ’13 - 6:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

they dont seem to care about trying to hide this stuff anymore. Nothing will ever be done about any of the buying of votes in DC. So I guess why hide it.

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
27 Nov ’13 - 9:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

true, it's very brazen

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 698

Currently Online:
122 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

easytapper: 2149

DangerDuke: 2030

groinkick: 1667

PorkChopsMmm: 1515

Gravel Road: 1455

Newest Members:

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 12

Topics: 11482

Posts: 58640

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 19842

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: K