that reminds me, I need to figure out what we are going to do about insurance
TWIN FALLS -- The Twin Falls School District says the Affordable Care Act is causing them to make tough decisions when it comes to some of their employees' hours.
The school board made the decision this spring to reduce paraprofessional hours from 30 a week down to 27.5 hours a week.
It affected 150 employees throughout the district, including positions like janitors, substitute teachers, and food service workers.
Previously, they were part-time employees receiving part-time benefits, at 30 hours a week.
Now, they are still part-time employees receiving part-time benefits, but working a half hour less each day.
The school board made the decision because under the Affordable Care Act, if an employee works 30 hours a week, they must be be offered full-time benefits.
The district estimated that would cost about $7,000 per employee, totaling more than $1 million.
Shannon Swafford is the Human Resources Director and said it was a tough decision, but one the district had to make.
"It's a huge decision for the district and not something we take lightly at all, we really value our employees a lot and we had 150 paras, which we are fortunate to be able to have a large number of paras on our staff, and if we were going to have 150 paras on full-time that would be a cost of over a million dollars," said Swafford.
Swafford said they did tell the employees last year to prepare them and give them time to look for new work if they wanted to. She said most stayed with the Twin Falls School District.
The issue was brought up at last week's school board meeting.
Members decided to put together a committee to look into the district's salaries for classified workers.
Swafford says they want to make sure that everyone is paid at a fair rate, especially after so much concern over the cut in hours.
19 Feb ’12
It was supposed to "save jobs" but that's just more smoke and mirrors. They still have 150 jobs, but now they cut 75 hours of labor. Using Obama math, that was no loss in jobs. And if they cut those hours in half, but employed twice as many people that would be "a gain of 150 jobs".
12 Oct ’12
Sad isn't it? I work at a "certain" University in the state of Michigan that has cut student workers' hours way back (below 30 hours a week now) in order to not have to give them full time/benefits as required under the new provisions of the ACA. So now student workers are not only having to go buy insurance or face being fined, but they are also getting hosed on their ability to get any hours while in school as well! What a deal...
easytapper said
It was supposed to "save jobs" but that's just more smoke and mirrors. They still have 150 jobs, but now they cut 75 hours of labor. Using Obama math, that was no loss in jobs. And if they cut those hours in half, but employed twice as many people that would be "a gain of 150 jobs".
that makes my head hurt
19 Feb ’12
jonathco said
Sad isn't it? I work at a "certain" University in the state of Michigan that has cut student workers' hours way back (below 30 hours a week now) in order to not have to give them full time/benefits as required under the new provisions of the ACA. So now student workers are not only having to go buy insurance or face being fined, but they are also getting hosed on their ability to get any hours while in school as well! What a deal...
They get screwed coming AND going.
The following users say thank you to easytapper for this useful post:
jonathcoMost Users Ever Online: 698
Currently Online:
100 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
easytapper: 2149
DangerDuke: 2030
groinkick: 1667
PorkChopsMmm: 1515
Gravel Road: 1455
Newest Members:
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 12
Topics: 11482
Posts: 58640
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2
Members: 19842
Moderators: 0
Admins: 1
Administrators: K