FDA now requiring prescriptions for farmers | Animals | Forums

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed F-Animals
FDA now requiring prescriptions for farmers
Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
15 Apr ’12 - 7:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

this will have a impact on the ag community

Farmers and ranchers will for the first time need a prescription from a veterinarian before using antibiotics in farm animals, in hopes that more judicious use of the drugs will reduce the tens of thousands of human deaths that result each year from the drugs’ overuse.

The Food and Drug Administration announced the new rule Wednesday after trying for more than 35 years to stop farmers and ranchers from feeding antibiotics to cattle, pigs, chickens and other animals simply to help the animals grow larger. Using small amounts of antibiotics over long periods of time leads to the growth of bacteria that are resistant to the drugs’ effects, endangering humans who become infected but cannot be treated with routine antibiotic therapy.

At least two million people are sickened and an estimated 99,000 die every year from hospital-acquired infections, the majority of which result from such resistant strains. It is unknown how many of these illnesses and deaths result from agricultural uses of antibiotics, but about 80 percent of antibiotics sold in the United States are used in animals.

Michael Taylor, the F.D.A.’s deputy commissioner for food, predicted that the new restrictions would save lives because farmers would have to convince a veterinarian that their animals were either sick or at risk of getting a specific illness. Just using the drugs for growth will be disallowed and, it is hoped, this will cut their use sharply. The new requirements will also make obtaining antibiotics more cumbersome and expensive.

“We’re confident that it will result in significant reductions in agricultural antibiotic use,” Mr. Taylor said. “That’s why we’re doing this.”

http://www.nytimes.c.....-says.html

Avatar
rinkus
Farm Hand
Members
Forum Posts: 149
Member Since:
18 Mar ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
15 Apr ’12 - 8:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I am speechless. The real offenders are the mega farms that already have a vet on staff and use a steady stream of antibiotics as a preemptive cure to keep their investment producing. It will be nothing but a formality for them.

It will mostly affect small farmers who use antibiotics only when needed to solve a problem after diagnosis. The federal government has declared war on the small farmer.

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
15 Apr ’12 - 8:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

my thoughts as well

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 698

Currently Online: kennithalston06
10 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

easytapper: 2149

DangerDuke: 2030

groinkick: 1667

PorkChopsMmm: 1515

Gravel Road: 1455

Newest Members:

margol6703496

loganfajardo0

claytonmelville

eleanorbeltran7

georgiazoll0

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 12

Topics: 11478

Posts: 58674

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 3682

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: K