Crash test 1959 versus 2009 | The Compost Bin | Forums

A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
Guest

sp_Registration Register sp_LogInOut Log In
sp_Search Search
Advanced Search
Search

— Forum Scope —





— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Search Search

Register Lost password?
sp_Feed F-Compost-Bin
Crash test 1959 versus 2009
Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
sp_Twitter sp_Facebook
1
29 Sep ’14 - 10:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

wow

http://i.imgur.com/7fYQaOc.gif

Avatar
easytapper
Rancher
Members
Forum Posts: 2149
Member Since:
19 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
30 Sep ’14 - 10:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Really not what I was expecting. I thought it was going to be the argument that old cars were tanks, etc. I would love to see statistics on traffic deaths on say 1974 vs. 2014. You'd think with the advent of airbags, etc. along with seatbelt laws that traffic deaths would be down like 1000%.

Avatar
K
Admin
Forum Posts: 31782
Member Since:
15 Feb ’12
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
sp_Twitter sp_Facebook
3
30 Sep ’14 - 6:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

yeah, crumple zones make a huge difference, my wife got hit from behind at less than 20 miles a hour, couldn't even really see any damage, it cost 2000 to fix

sp_Feed
Go to top
Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 698

Currently Online: richie8365
31 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

easytapper: 2149

DangerDuke: 2030

groinkick: 1667

PorkChopsMmm: 1515

Gravel Road: 1455

Newest Members:

carsonmilligan

jettasex8138

dortheagrano955

justine3607

orvalsaltau

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 12

Topics: 11478

Posts: 58673

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 2

Members: 3532

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Administrators: K